February 29, 2020

Building character(s)


When reading articles about Pat & Mat, you will often find a sentence reading something like this: "It was in the first TV episode Tapety where they got their definitive look." On the face of it (pun intended), that's a mostly correct statement. However, I would say that the final important change to Pat and Mat's look is a subtle one which happened in 1982, specifically in the first of that year's episodes, Sťahovanie. That change would the last one to shape the characters into the ones we know and love today.

The handymen before and after 1982 were identical ― except for their faces. The faces were redesigned at that point; the eyes became thinner, their shape going from thick ovals to either an almost rectangular shape or a small circles, depending on the puppets used. The mouths were also changed. Before, different expressions were used to convey the two's emotions, with a circle representing shock or surprise and :( representing what it usually does, sadness and disappointment.

Mat going from sad...
... to confused in a matter of frames
the duo shocked at the end of Grill

Even though they were possibly made to conserve time, these changes brought about several fresh ways to handle the characters and imbued them with more comedic potential. When their eyes became smaller, Pat and Mat became less goofy, a bit more aware of what they were doing. This gave their DIY failures an even bigger punch as the "heroes" could be held even more responsible for their complete failures.
proud of their achievements

usually before disaster strucks

Getting rid of the mouth expressions meant that much more attention was given to the posing. Whereas previously animators could show Pat's shock with a simple circle on his mouth, they now had to rely on the clever placement of his hands, legs, caps and everything else. This opened up new avenues for the stories and their gags. The humor could now also be constructed from the reactions of the protagonists to their exploits and to one another, not just in the typical action situations. Interestingly, the lack of facial expression gave the two characters more character depth.

It is not surprising that the animator chosen to handle the first episode with this design tweak was Jan Klos, who will be the topic of my next post, but for something different. I find him the series' best animator of all time when it comes to the interplay between the two DIY masters: he best portrayed all the emotions that Pat and Mat could now offer.

I think the episode that perfectly illustrates this is Búdka. I remember being a bit disappointed with this episode when I was a kid, feeling that nothing much happens in it. In fact, its humor is very subtle, based mostly on the interaction between Pat, Mat and a bird, represented only by sound recordings. I think that's why it could be more appreciated by adults. Here's the episode:



A quick note - the copy posted above is not official, so it may get deleted at some point. I intentionally don't post links to videos from the copyright holder, Bonton, because they are awful. Bonton are so lazy that they uploaded copies of the episodes downloaded from torrents and they even messed those up, with picture cropping and out-of-sync sound present on many copies, often together.
 
Obviously, it was deemed that this adjustment was very successful, as ever since both of the changes were implemented completely. Pat and Mat today have almost-rectangular-shaped eyes and don't change their mouth expression during the course of an episode. There were some minor design changes later on, the latest of them undertaken in 2002's Puzzle, when Mat's hat was redesigned, but none as important as this.

Pat and Mat in 2014 (photo: Patmat film)

12 comments:

  1. I just read your latest post and honestly I'd like to see in new episodes faces of astonished, sadness and maybe even anger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It could be done, but not as obvious as in 1976-1981.

      Delete
  2. Marin Pažanin your blog is a epic

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The expressions made a brief return in Karty, I discuss that in the post about that episode on the blog. There were also some minor alterations where Mat got a joyful mouth after thinking of an idea in Skokani (around 6:40) and Pracka (7:50).

      Delete
  4. I think your comments on the short-lived use of different facial expressions on the Pat and Mat puppets are very insightful, particularly your observation that getting rid of the mouth expressions meant that much more attention was given to the posing, with the result that the characters gained more depth.

    The problem with the changes of expressions that were used on the puppets is that they can strike some viewers as too broad and too coarse a means of communicating the required emotion, especially when contrasted with the more subtle expressions that are being created by the animator through body movement and gesture.

    Such extreme changes of expression can also have the effect of actually drawing attention to the fact that the characters’ faces are usually immobile, whereas when the expressions remain fixed, the audience accepts this as a convention and doesn’t think anything of it.

    Rather than telegraphing an obvious emotion through symbolic means such as a round circle for shock or a downturned mouth for sadness, a head with fixed expression trusts that if the context is conveyed clearly enough by the animator, the viewers’ imagination will do the rest. This is the almost magical nature of the puppet – an audience actually thinks they see a range of emotion crossing a puppet’s face, when in fact it is their emotional identification with the situation that leads them to project the appropriate expression onto the puppet.

    Beneš obviously decided that the experiment of changing the expressions on Pat and Mat was not successful, and kept the expressions fixed from then on. As you point out, this “limitation”, though, brought forth great inventiveness from animators like Klos, who used the “hat popping in the air to signify surprise” take, and the hat over the eyes to subtly alter the expression. When the option of using different facial expressions was taken away from them, animators had to dig deeper to find more creative ways of conveying the characters’ emotional states, and this enriched the episodes.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder whether getting rid of the expressions also happened because of time constraints. What do you think was the time needed to change an expression and did animators have to draw them on the puppet heads every time or were there some more sophisticated methods present? I presume they had some sorts of patterns as the shapes of the expressions don't change much.

      Delete
  5. I don’t think time constraints would be a factor. The usual way to change expressions is either to have “sticks-ons”, which are shapes (such as mouth shapes) cut from pieces of black electrical tape (for example) that are applied to a head and then peeled off as required, or even to have separate heads with the alternate expressions painted on them permanently, which are substituted during the shot. Heads on stop-motion puppets are usually very easily removed, which makes this quite practical. Generally you avoid having to actually draw the expressions on the heads as different animators would do it differently, it could be messy, and there would be a lack of consistency. I haven’t looked closely, but I’d guess they might use stick-ons, as the change only seems to involve the mouth shape, from what I remember.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, only the mouth shapes changes, so stick-ons are probably the setup they used. The changes are very consistent, so I thought that the animators drawing on the heads was unlikely.

      There is a fine line when it comes to the static expressions used in a whole episode as well. One thing I didn't mention in the post are puppets used by František Váša in the 1994 episodes. To me, they have overly large grins, especially Pat (with a yellow sweater). The line is just too big and makes the character seem amused all the time, which has a negative effect on the acting and has always bothered me a bit. Take a look at the shots from Trezor at 3:53 and 6:06 for instance. Pat is supposed to be shocked in the first and undecided in the second and covers his mouth, but the expression he covers makes it look like he is smiling. It should be much more neutral. I'm surprised this didn't get fixed in production. Video here:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d9ORXfS6fU

      Delete
  6. Unfortunately, whenever there are elements of a puppet’s expression that are able to be changed by the animator (such as stick on mouths or eyebrows) there is always the chance that the puppet will go “off model” as they say – i.e. the puppet won’t look quite how it’s supposed to look. Even a stick-on smile that curves upwards a little too much will start to cause problems. That’s why, wherever possible, puppet heads are made so that all element on the heads are fixed. If you look at the puppets in Jaja and Paja, all the elements that could end up being arranged differently by the animator (the hair, moustache etc.) are solid sculpts, so that they will remain “on-model” at all times. If the puppets had soft hair, for example, animators would be arranging it in different ways, some of which would not be right. This is why Trnka, right from the very beginning, realized that he had to paint the puppet heads himself, and ensure as much as possible that there were no adjustments in terms of expression that could be left to the animator. Apparently one of Trnka’s main issues with 2D (drawn) animation was that the original drawing ended up going through so many hands and being redrawn that it was hard to keep it consistent. One of the reasons Beneš may have rejected changing the expressions with stick-ons is because he could see that they would be applied inconsistently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I should add to my previous comment that the overly large grins are also apparent in Kabriolet (1992), where Mensdorff-Pouilly uses those puppets for the first and only time.

      Delete

Comments are moderated and manually approved.